̽����ѡ

Antithrombin deficiency, the most severe congenital thrombophilia, might be underestimated, as some pathogenic variants are not detected by routine functional methods. We have identified 2 new SERPINC1 variants, p.Glu227Lys and p.Asn224His, in 4 unrelated thrombophilic patients with early and recurrent thrombosis that had normal antithrombin activity. In one case, the mutation was identified by whole genome sequencing, while in the 3 remaining cases, the mutation was identified by sequencing SERPINC1 based on a single functional positive finding supporting deficiency. The 2 variants shared a common functional defect, an impaired or null N-glycosylation of Asn224 according to a eukaryotic expression model. Carriers had normal anti-FXa or anti-FIIa activities but impaired anti-FVIIa activity and a detectable loss of inhibitory function when incubating the plasma for 1 hour at 41°C. Moreover, the b glycoform of the variants, lacking 2 N-glycans, had reduced secretion, increased heparin affinity, no inhibitory activity, and a potential dominant–negative effect. These results explain the increased thrombin generation observed in carriers. Mutation experiments reflected the role that Lysine residues close to the N-glycosylation sequon have in impairing the efficacy of N-glycosylation. Our study shows new elements involved in the regulation of N-glycosylation, a key posttranslational modification that, according to our results, affects folding, secretion, and function, providing new evidence of the pathogenic consequence of an incorrect N-glycosylation of antithrombin. This study supports that antithrombin deficiency is underestimated and encourages the development of new functional and genetic tests to diagnose this severe thrombophilia.

Background There are no data on the effect of low-dose anticoagulation as secondary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose apixaban for 30 months, after initial 6 months of full-dose treatment. Methods We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE in a single arm interventional clinical trial. All patients were treated with full-dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) for 6 months. Total 196 patients with active cancer after 6 months treatment continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for another 30 months. The main endpoints were recurrent VTE, major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Results During the 30 months of treatment with low-dose apixaban 14 (7.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0%–11.7%) patients experienced recurrent VTE, six (3.1%; 95% CI 1.1%–6.5%) experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.1%, 95% CI: 4.7%–12.8%) experienced clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The incidence rate per person month of recurrent VTE was 0.8% (95% CI 0.41–1.6) at 2–6 months with full-dose apixaban, and 1.0% (95% CI 0.5–1.9) at 7–12 months with low-dose apixaban. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1% (95% CI 0.6–2.0) at 2–6 months, and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1–1.0) at 7–12 months. Between 12 and 36 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low. Conclusion Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily seems safe after 6 months of full-dose treatment. After 12 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleeding remained low.

Introduction: Physical activity may reduce the development of breast cancer. Whereas hypercoagulability has been linked to adverse outcomes in breast cancer patients, the effects of physical activity on their hemostatic factors are unknown. The study aimed to assess whether long-term (1 year) physical activity can affect hemostatic factors in breast cancer patients. Methods: Fifty-five women (35–75 years) with invasive breast cancer stage I/II were randomized to a physical activity intervention (n = 29) lasting 1 year or to a control group (n = 26), and analyzed as intention to treat. Fibrinogen, factor VII antigen, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen as well as prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, the endogenous thrombin potential and D-dimer, were measured in plasma before intervention (baseline), and then after 6 and 12 months. Results: Maximal oxygen uptake (measure of cardiorespiratory fitness) decreased the first 6 months among the controls, but remained stable in the intervention group. We found no significant differences between the two study groups regarding any of the hemostatic factors, except a significantly higher increase in factor VII antigen in the intervention group. The effect of the intervention on VWF was, however, significantly affected by menopausal stage, and a significant effect of the intervention was found on VWF among postmenopausal women, even after adjustment for dietary intake. Conclusion: Long-term physical activity had no effect on the majority of the hemostatic factors measured, but led to increased plasma concentrations of factor VII antigen and prevented an increase in VWF concentration after breast cancer treatment in postmenopausal women. The clinical impact of these findings for risk of vascular thrombosis warrants further studies.

The randomized “Testicular cancer and Aerobic and Strength Training trial” (TAST‐trial) aimed to evaluate the effect of high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) on cardiorespiratory fitness during cisplatin‐based chemotherapy (CBCT) for testicular cancer (TC). Here, we report on an unexpected high number of thromboembolic (TE) events among patients randomized to the intervention arm, and on a review of the literature on TE events in TC patients undergoing CBCT. Patients aged 18 to 60 years with a diagnosis of metastatic germ cell TC, planned for 3 to 4 CBCT cycles, were randomized to a 9 to 12 weeks exercise intervention, or to a single lifestyle counseling session. The exercise intervention included two weekly HIIT sessions, each with 2 to 4 intervals of 2 to 4 minutes at 85% to 95% of peak heart rate. The study was prematurely discontinued after inclusion of 19 of the planned 94 patients, with nine patients randomized to the intervention arm and 10 to the control arm. Three patients in the intervention arm developed TE complications; two with pulmonary embolism and one with myocardial infarction. All three patients had clinical stage IIA TC. No TE complications were observed among patients in the control arm. Our observations indicate that high‐intensity aerobic training during CBCT might increase the risk of TE events in TC patients, leading to premature closure of the TAST‐trial.

Background and Purpose— In randomized stroke trials, central adjudication of a trial’s primary outcome is regularly implemented. However, recent evidence questions the importance of central adjudication in randomized trials. The aim of this review was to compare outcomes assessed by central adjudicators with outcomes assessed by site investigators. Methods— We included randomized stroke trials where the primary outcome had undergone an assessment by site investigators and central adjudicators. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar for eligible studies. We extracted information about the adjudication process as well as the treatment effect for the primary outcome, assessed both by central adjudicators and by site investigators. We calculated the ratio of these treatment effects so that a ratio of these treatment effects >1 indicated that central adjudication resulted in a more beneficial treatment effect than assessment by the site investigator. A random-effects meta-analysis model was fitted to estimate a pooled effect. Results— Fifteen trials, comprising 69 560 participants, were included. The primary outcomes included were stroke (8/15, 53%), a composite event including stroke (6/15, 40%) and functional outcome after stroke measured on the modified Rankin Scale (1/15, 7%). The majority of site investigators were blind to treatment allocation (9/15, 60%). On average, there was no difference in treatment effect estimates based on data from central adjudicators and site investigators (pooled ratio of these treatment effects=1.02; 95% CI, [0.95–1.09]). Conclusions— We found no evidence that central adjudication of the primary outcome in stroke trials had any impact on trial conclusions. This suggests that potential advantages of central adjudication may not outweigh cost and time disadvantages in stroke studies if the primary purpose of adjudication is to ensure validity of trial findings.